Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Yay! My 1000th post! Some Old Albic historical phonology

From:Elliott Lash <erelion12@...>
Date:Thursday, August 2, 2007, 16:32
Jörg,

  I just checked this post out, since I've been wildly
behind on most of my email lately. I think this post
is really lovely. The types of changes you detail here
are things that I've tried to assemble for Silindion
many a time, but I have not yet gotten it right.  I'm
especially impressed by the vowel alerations produced
by the loss (or non-loss) of semi-vowels. This strikes
me as rather reminiscent of Adunaic (see Lowdham's
report, I think in Sauron Defeated) - although I can
see the Indo-European influence as well (especially
the notation involved, i.e. CeRC, etc). I'm not saying
this disparagingly. I, for one, greatly appreciate
such a conlanging-style. Well done!


 -Elliott


--- Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...> wrote:

> Hallo! > > This is my 1000th post to the CONLANG list, and > within this post, > I am going to present a facet of the historical > phonology of > Old Albic, namely the development of the vowels, > about which > I have found out some new things lately. > > Old Albic has seven short and seven long vowels, > transcribed > _a e i o ø u y_ (short) and _á é í ó ǿ ú ý_ > (long). > Proto-Albic, however, the reconstructed common > ancestor of all > Albic languages and dialects, had only three, namely > *a, *i and *u, > without length distinction. > > So how die the 2*7 vowels of Old Albic evolve from > the three vowels > of Proto-Albic? First, I will concentrate on the > short vowels. > In Proto-Albic, the vowel features [+open], [+front] > and [+round] > became autosegmental, which means that they attached > to morphemes > rather than vowel segments. In a sense, there was > only one "vowel > phoneme", transcribed _°_, and three prosodic > features. This can > be summarized in the rules given in (1): > > (1) a > °[+open] > i > °[+front] > u > °[+round] > > So, a Proto-Albic compound word such as *hajal-um-i > 'with both eyes' > was realized as something like this: > > (2) [+open] [+round] [+front] > | | / > | | / > h°j°l -°m -° > > This shows how a bisyllabic morpheme, such as *hajal > 'eye', has the > same feature attached to both vowels. Proto-Albic > did not allow > morphemes with two different vowels. > > In Proto-Albic, each morpheme had at most one > feature attached. > In Old Albic, there are also morphemes with two > features attached, > which are realized at the surface as /e/ ([+open] > and [+front]) > and /o/ ([+open] and [+round]). An example is the > Old Albic word > for 'eye', _hela_. Such words result from the > deletion of > semivowels combined with the addition of a vowel > feature. Words > of the types CeC and CoC come from two kinds of > protoforms, > namely *CajaC-/*CavaC- and *CaiC-/*CauC-. In both > cases, the > semivowel is deleted and the corresponding feature > added, with > the two vowel positions merging in the first type: > > (3) *°j° > °[+front] > *°v° > °[+round] > > (4) *j > Ø[+front] /°C$ ($=syllable boundary) > *v > Ø[+round] /°C$ > > The change (3) is very common; among many other > words (such as > *hajal > hel 'eye') it affected the gender > derivation suffixes, > which were *-va (male) and *-ja (female) in > Proto-Albic. > Together with the agentive stem forming suffix *-a > they gave > the Old Albic forms -o < *-a-va and -e < *-a-ja. > > The change (4) underlies many words with mid vowels > and final > obstruents, such as boc- < *bauc- 'to flee'. > Because diphthongs > which were not followed by tautosyllabic consonants > (consonants > within the same syllable) were unaffected, > alternations between > mid vowels and diphthongs were the result, e.g. > > (5) obosca < *°-bauc-sa 'he fled' (aorist) > vs. baucara < *bauc-a-ra 'he flees' (present) > > Roots of the shape CeRC-/CoRC- come via (3) from > *CajaRC-/*CavaRC-, > e.g. > > (6) vern < *vajarn 'good' > > Some Old Albic bisyllabic roots such as _semel_ > 'wheat' appear > not to be covered by the rules given above. These > are usually > compounded or derived forms. The Proto-Albic origin > of _semel_, > for instance, is *sajam-al, a derivative of *sajam- > 'to sow' > (OA _sem-_), which became *sem-al under rule (3) and > later > _semel_. > > In Old Albic, there is also an umlaut rule in > operation. > If a vowel has only one feature attached, this > feature spreads > to the preceding morpheme. Hence, high vowels > preceding /a/ > are lowered; back vowels preceding /i/ are fronted; > unround > vowels preceding /u/ are rounded. Examples: > > (7) sach 'shoe' > sochum < *sach-um 'pair of shoes' > sechim < *sach-im 'shoes' > > Under this rule, two new vowels could arise, the > front rounded > vowels /ø/ and /y/. The word in (2) became, for > example, _helymi_. > > What is now left to explain are the long vowels. > These result > from two sources, namely the loss of /h/, > occasionally also > other consonants, between vowel and consonant with > compensatory > lengthening, and the contraction of two short vowels > of the same > quality, as in > > (8) baráma < *bar-a-a-ma 'I carry it' > > Thank you for reading all this. I hope you enjoyed > it. > Now for the next 1000 posts! > > ... brought to you by the Weeping Elf >
____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC