Re: Yay! My 1000th post! Some Old Albic historical phonology
|From:||Elliott Lash <erelion12@...>|
|Date:||Thursday, August 2, 2007, 16:32|
I just checked this post out, since I've been wildly
behind on most of my email lately. I think this post
is really lovely. The types of changes you detail here
are things that I've tried to assemble for Silindion
many a time, but I have not yet gotten it right. I'm
especially impressed by the vowel alerations produced
by the loss (or non-loss) of semi-vowels. This strikes
me as rather reminiscent of Adunaic (see Lowdham's
report, I think in Sauron Defeated) - although I can
see the Indo-European influence as well (especially
the notation involved, i.e. CeRC, etc). I'm not saying
this disparagingly. I, for one, greatly appreciate
such a conlanging-style. Well done!
--- Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...> wrote:
> This is my 1000th post to the CONLANG list, and
> within this post,
> I am going to present a facet of the historical
> phonology of
> Old Albic, namely the development of the vowels,
> about which
> I have found out some new things lately.
> Old Albic has seven short and seven long vowels,
> _a e i o Ã¸ u y_ (short) and _Ã¡ Ã© Ã Ã³ Ç¿ Ãº Ã½_
> Proto-Albic, however, the reconstructed common
> ancestor of all
> Albic languages and dialects, had only three, namely
> *a, *i and *u,
> without length distinction.
> So how die the 2*7 vowels of Old Albic evolve from
> the three vowels
> of Proto-Albic? First, I will concentrate on the
> short vowels.
> In Proto-Albic, the vowel features [+open], [+front]
> and [+round]
> became autosegmental, which means that they attached
> to morphemes
> rather than vowel segments. In a sense, there was
> only one "vowel
> phoneme", transcribed _Â°_, and three prosodic
> features. This can
> be summarized in the rules given in (1):
> (1) a > Â°[+open]
> i > Â°[+front]
> u > Â°[+round]
> So, a Proto-Albic compound word such as *hajal-um-i
> 'with both eyes'
> was realized as something like this:
> (2) [+open] [+round] [+front]
> | | /
> | | /
> hÂ°jÂ°l -Â°m -Â°
> This shows how a bisyllabic morpheme, such as *hajal
> 'eye', has the
> same feature attached to both vowels. Proto-Albic
> did not allow
> morphemes with two different vowels.
> In Proto-Albic, each morpheme had at most one
> feature attached.
> In Old Albic, there are also morphemes with two
> features attached,
> which are realized at the surface as /e/ ([+open]
> and [+front])
> and /o/ ([+open] and [+round]). An example is the
> Old Albic word
> for 'eye', _hela_. Such words result from the
> deletion of
> semivowels combined with the addition of a vowel
> feature. Words
> of the types CeC and CoC come from two kinds of
> namely *CajaC-/*CavaC- and *CaiC-/*CauC-. In both
> cases, the
> semivowel is deleted and the corresponding feature
> added, with
> the two vowel positions merging in the first type:
> (3) *Â°jÂ° > Â°[+front]
> *Â°vÂ° > Â°[+round]
> (4) *j > Ã[+front] /Â°C$ ($=syllable boundary)
> *v > Ã[+round] /Â°C$
> The change (3) is very common; among many other
> words (such as
> *hajal > hel 'eye') it affected the gender
> derivation suffixes,
> which were *-va (male) and *-ja (female) in
> Together with the agentive stem forming suffix *-a
> they gave
> the Old Albic forms -o < *-a-va and -e < *-a-ja.
> The change (4) underlies many words with mid vowels
> and final
> obstruents, such as boc- < *bauc- 'to flee'.
> Because diphthongs
> which were not followed by tautosyllabic consonants
> within the same syllable) were unaffected,
> alternations between
> mid vowels and diphthongs were the result, e.g.
> (5) obosca < *Â°-bauc-sa 'he fled' (aorist)
> vs. baucara < *bauc-a-ra 'he flees' (present)
> Roots of the shape CeRC-/CoRC- come via (3) from
> (6) vern < *vajarn 'good'
> Some Old Albic bisyllabic roots such as _semel_
> 'wheat' appear
> not to be covered by the rules given above. These
> are usually
> compounded or derived forms. The Proto-Albic origin
> of _semel_,
> for instance, is *sajam-al, a derivative of *sajam-
> 'to sow'
> (OA _sem-_), which became *sem-al under rule (3) and
> In Old Albic, there is also an umlaut rule in
> If a vowel has only one feature attached, this
> feature spreads
> to the preceding morpheme. Hence, high vowels
> preceding /a/
> are lowered; back vowels preceding /i/ are fronted;
> vowels preceding /u/ are rounded. Examples:
> (7) sach 'shoe'
> sochum < *sach-um 'pair of shoes'
> sechim < *sach-im 'shoes'
> Under this rule, two new vowels could arise, the
> front rounded
> vowels /Ã¸/ and /y/. The word in (2) became, for
> example, _helymi_.
> What is now left to explain are the long vowels.
> These result
> from two sources, namely the loss of /h/,
> occasionally also
> other consonants, between vowel and consonant with
> lengthening, and the contraction of two short vowels
> of the same
> quality, as in
> (8) barÃ¡ma < *bar-a-a-ma 'I carry it'
> Thank you for reading all this. I hope you enjoyed
> Now for the next 1000 posts!
> ... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search
that gives answers, not web links.