Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: genetics

From:Ed Heil <edheil@...>
Date:Wednesday, June 30, 1999, 20:36
FWIW, Gamkredlize and Ivanov are the biggest names in Glottalic
Theory; they've made quite a splash in Indo-European studies, and
while not everybody accepts their proposals, they are certainly
listened to.  What did they say in this piece?


+ Ed Heil ---------------------- edheil@postmark.net +
|    "What matter that you understood no word!       |
|    Doubtless I spoke or sang what I had heard      |
|           In broken sentences."  --Yeats           |
+----------------------------------------------------+

Boudewijn Rempt wrote:

> I've just been looking at the two articles mentioned a while > ago (_Did Indo-European Languages spread before farming?_ > and _The Early History of Indo-European Languages_), but > I've lost the URL's... > > Anyway, the first is a really interesting language, but I've > mailed the authors to point out that Swadesh isn't really considered > a linguist anymore - the authors are not linguists, and I noted, > not geneticists, either. > > The second article is by Thomas V. Gamkrelidze and V. V. Ivanov, > and I don't know whether I can really take it seriously. On the face > of it, by my own judgement, I wouldn't, but as I'm not a specialist > in the field, I'd have to read what other think about it in order > to calibrate my opinion ;-). It wasn't very informative about the > link between genetics and linguistics, the only mention of > genetics being plant genetics. > > -- > > Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.xs4all.nl/~bsarempt >