Re: vowel scheme for new language
From: | dunn patrick w <tb0pwd1@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 19, 1999, 21:20 |
On Wed, 19 May 1999, JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 1999, dunn patrick w wrote:
>
> > Does this sound like a plausible vowel scheme?
> >
> > a -- low back
> > e -- mid front
> > i -- high front
> > o -- round low back
> > u -- round mid front
>
> If by "plausible" you mean "likely to occur in natural languages",
> I would have to say no. Human languages prefer to have 'balanced'
> vowel systems, e.g.:
--snip--
Well, that looks like a general consensus of "no way". Hrmm. I noticed a
tendency of it to run away from me anyway. That damned /i/ insisted on
showing up.
> Or: i u
> e o
> a
What's a pity is I like this vowel scheme. Always have. But I'd *hate*
to use it since it's so damned common. Conlang guilt, you know?