Oops.
I wrote:
> Instead of confining affixes to a separate section of the dictionary
> (a very fine idea, IMO), you could also include derived lexical items
> under the root from which they are derived in a tree-like structure.
This doesn't make a lot of sense the way I wrote it. What I meant to
say was that I thought the idea of including a separate index for
affixes was a fine idea *in addition* to the more articulated tree
structure for individual root entries.
Dirk
--
Dirk Elzinga
dirk.elzinga@m.cc.utah.edu