Re: Tit'xka (Pretty Long Post)

Nik Taylor wrote:
>
> Eric Christopherson wrote:
> > I was just wondering the other day, "are there any languages without
> > either /o/ or /u/, or without either /e/ or /i/?"
>
> Do you mean "with neither /o/ or /u/, or neither /e/ or /i/"?  If so,
> AFAIK, there are no natlangs like that, except sign language.  :-)
Exactly.