Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger)

From:Tamás Racskó <tracsko@...>
Date:Tuesday, June 22, 2004, 11:11
On 22 Jun 2004 Andreas Johansson <andjo@FR..> wrote:

> Personally, I perceive a fairly basic difference 'tween, say, the systems of > English and Swedish in this regard
You are right, in word-final positions English and Swedish uses the opposite extremities of the "general Germanic spelling". That was why I used conditional tense because I did not remember the exact Swedish usage in this field. However, due to the long historic co-existence, German is still the typical Germanic for me (not the English), and German applies the "Swedish method", cf. "Pik" 'peak; (to have an) edge (on somebody)' vs. "pick!" 'pick!'. (And the present German spelling reform extended this also to the final ss's and ß's.)
> For added trouble, there's a rival analysis of Swedish, on this > list championed by BP, that holds that vocalic length in Swedish is > allophonic, being triggered by consonant length
Oh, these are the merits of my slang phrase "general Germanic orthography", i.e. consonant doubling does not mean phonemic geminates, it is rather a convention for coding vocalic length. In this case, it is not significant that in some Germanic languages (e.g. Swedish, German) word boundary is treated as [+vowel] and in some other languages (e.g. English, Dutch) it is [-vowel] in terms of orthography. However, I see from your explanation that vowel and consonant length is somehow connected in Swedish. I think we can consider both vocalic and consonantal length as primary (according to our socialization and scientific bias), moreover it may vary from subject to subject. Thus if we talk about the orthography, the vowel length could be the primary since Swedish is part of the Germanic cultural space.
> But if you did not mean to imply that partial orthographic adaption > is unknown or next to unknown, we're not in disagreement.
We are not in complete disagreement since I meant that we cannot expect partial orthgraphic adatpation in case of a "regulated" orthography. I am not convinced, though, that your Swedish example is more general among the languages than my supposition. I would be very interested in examples in other languages: French, Dutch, Spanish etc.

Reply

Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>