Re: Are pidgins natlangs? (was Re: Telona Grammar, part 2)
From: | J Y S Czhang <czhang23@...> |
Date: | Friday, February 15, 2002, 4:50 |
In a message dated 2002.02.14 10.07.28 AM, and_yo@HOTMAIL.COM writes:
>I thought "natlang" was to be expanded as "native language", in which case
>pidgins by definition aren't any, wereas creoles by definition are. What
>do you mean by "natlang"? "Naturally occuring language"?
>
::chagrin:: I have always thought NatLang was/is short for "Natural
Language."
In a message dated 2002.02.14 10.25.32 AM, jcowan@REUTERSHEALTH.COM writes:
>That is the usual understanding, yes.
::wry grin:: Sheesh, for a moment there I thought I had been
_semantically warped_ by my AuxLang-ing period...
::cheeky grin:: ArtLang is "Artistic Language," right? Right? or is it
"Artificial Language"? ::muttering to self as he rummages thru a confusion of
linguistics files:: ok, where's that damn FAQ...
czHANg23,
Avatar of Sun WuKong, a.k.a. "Monkey," a.k.a. "TricksterGod of the Han
Chinese"
~ om hung hanumatay rudratmakai hung phat ~
- mantra to Hanuman the Hindu Monkey TricksterGod
Hail to thee TricksterGods! IO THEE CHAOSGODHEAD!!!
~ thee Tru Pries ov Existenz iz Ætern'l Warfær & Creativ Playf'llniz~
- § - by hook or by crook - § -
Reply