Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Degree in Ithkuil vs. S7

From:Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>
Date:Friday, March 26, 2004, 19:05
John Quijada <jq_ithkuil@...> writes:
>... > Ithkuil can achieve the same functional "refinement" of gradation by > combining affixes so that one affix modifies another, as opposed to > modifying the word as a whole.
This will be able in S7, too. The degree affixes will be attachable to any other stem/core/affix. However, many, many distinctions Ithkuil does are not systematic in S7, such as the circumstantial vs. derivational meaning. I only noticed the degrees. :-)
> (These are the "VsC" and "V3C" classes of affixes described in > Sec. 7.3 of the Ithkuil grammar). Of course, by having to combine > affixes, Ithkuil's system is not as elegant as S7,
Well, elegance is just personal taste.
> but as explained above, I was limited my the morpho-phonologically > available number of vowels/consonants.
Yes, there is a very impressive list of such affixes. :-)
> >Moreover, the realisation is also similar: mainly by vowels and > >combinable with different consonants for different types of degree. > > Ithkuil morpho-phonology, from its earliest conception 25 years ago, was > highly influenced by the Semitic triliteral root morphology,
And so is S7. :-)
> By the way, as long as we're discussing coincidental similarities between > S7 and Ithkuil, I've been corresponding privately with list-member Jonathan > Knibbs about his Telona language (now temporarily called T4), and he has > noted several surprising similarities between S7 and T4 as well.
Ah, I'd be interested. I think I talked with him about similarities between telona and S2. Some features are in both S2 and S7.
> I believe that the more one gives thought to designing an "engelang" > (as Jörg calls them), convergent design principles emerge from > separate authors, so that interesting similarities arise. It makes > one begin to wonder whether there are some hidden universal design > principles even in non-natlang conlangs!
Maybe. But maybe it's simply the mere number of languages that have been discussed and the number of features a language have that can all coincide. Up to now, all languages I saw where totally different at closer look. ;-) **Henrik