Re: Eihdan and Maggelity

Arthaey Angosii wrote:

>Emaelivpar Joseph Fatula:
>
>
>>first seem maggelitinous in its grammar, but in actual fact is a very
>>regular language.  It just follows an unusual set of rules.  Here are some
>>examples:
>>
>>
>In which case it's got etabnannery (it's etabnannerious?):
>
>Etabnannery /r@mn{n@ri/ (noun) The state of appearing entirely
>
It occurs to be that the first <a>, being long, is better associated
with the <a> of 'father'; and thus pronounced /ra:m"n&n@ri/
(rahm-NANN-ery to prevent misunderstandings. The IPA is only nice at
times...).

>unpredictable, but, upon closer analysis, failing at even being that.
>[from _Etábnanni_ a constructed language by Tristan McLeay, which was
>
While I'm correcting myself, I should point out that there's a macron
under that accute, too.

>*supposed* to have an unpredictable orthography, but ended up just
>having a confusing one. Damn people trying to make patterns everywhere.
>At least it's a bugger to typeset!... err... back to the derivation
>+_ery_]
>
Tristan.

>
>

http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
- What's on at your local cinema?