Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Primary Interjections - Universals?

From:Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Date:Saturday, April 6, 2002, 12:50
En réponse à Roger Christian <rogchr75@...>:

> > For example, compare the following interjections which > indicate pain or a bad surprise: > > English ow (pronounced /au/) > French/Spanish aie/ay (both pronounced /ay/)
You forgot French "ouille" /uj/ used at least as often as "aïe" (and more often among children).
> Swedish aj (pronounced /ay/) > Icelandic /ay/ & /au/ > > In my incredibly broad sample :), these interjections > are diphtongs moving from low to high, and I think > from lax to tense. English "ouch" is the same with > concluding stop. Can anyone contradict the thought > that this might be universal, that is, that > interjections for pain are back-to-front diphongs? >
Not back-to-front, but French "ouille" is an example of the fact that it's not mandatory to have low-to-high diphtongues.
> Meanwhile, I also wonder if primary interjections for > positive things (happiness, pleasant surprise, > curiosity, joy) are universally a low back vowel: > > English ah, oh > French ah, oh > Hungarian oh >
Even your own example contradicts your claims :)) . Since the sound change that fused /a/ and /A/ together in French, even "ah" is prononced with a low *front* vowel. Funny enough, it seems that intejections are partly sensitive to sound changes.
> And primary interjections for "tastes good," like > English yum/mmm may be universally /m:/ or at least > nasals? (Since, hypothetically, the speaker's mouth is > full.) Polish, Finnish, and Slovenian all have /m:/ >
And French too. For this one i think I would tend to agree with you. What about the sound used by people to try and impose silence on others? French has "chut !" /Syt/, English IIRC has "shhh..." /S:/. What do other languages do?
> > I'm not sure what to think of the English interjection > "wow" in this hypothesis--maybe it's a > counter-example. Still minimally, these are at least > all extremely vocalic. >
Well, the fact that exclamations are highly vocalic is quite understandable by the very mechanics of the mouth: by definition an exclamation involves opening the mouth wide, and it's difficult to make any consonant with a wide open mouth.
> Does anyone know any languages that have anything at > all different? very different? Any thoughts on the > matter are appreciated. >
I think you should look at Japanese. I don't know what interjections it has in those cases, but I know it's a very interjection-rich language, and it often has surprising ones. Christophe. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.

Reply

John Cowan <jcowan@...>