Re: Romlang problem in Terkunan
From: | Jeffrey Jones <jsjonesmiami@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, August 8, 2007, 3:30 |
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:45:33 +0200, Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>
wrote:
>Hello!
>
>A small problem arose concerning the sound shifts of Terkunan: I don't
>like the sound of -/ls/ at the end of words but it frequently occurs
>due to a regularised plural ending -/s/. Since the pronouns are
>regular, too, I constantly see |ilz| /ils/ 'they'.
>
>Any idea what to do about this? Terkunan is meant to be a typical
>romlang, but there is no trace of an l > u shift and I don't want one,
>because I don't like the diphthongs that will arise from that. There
>are quite frequent r <> l switches, however, but currently, the
>language tends towards -l at ends of words (e.g. arbul 'tree'). For
>polysyllabic words, anyway. I thought about having -l > -r in
>monosyllabics and switching the overall tendencies for l/r. It would
>affect a lot of things:
>
>(Current words are given in parens:)
>
> ILLE > (il) ir 'he,she,it' => irz 'they'
> CAELUM > (kel) ker 'heaven,sky' => kerz 'heavens, skies'
> SOL > (sul) sur 'sun'
> MILLE > (mil) mir 'thousand'
> NULLUM > (nul) nur 'zero'
> MALUM > (mal) mar 'bad' == mar 'ocean'
>
>And also:
>
> ARBOREM > (arbul) albur 'tree'
> MANTELUM > (mantil) mantir 'cape, cloak'
>
>Maybe even (less likely due to mixed original distribution of l and r):
> BOREALEM > (boral) bolar 'northern'
>
>I am not really content with this, especially the monosyllabics are
>not what I dream of.
>
>What other shifts of -l would be feasible? Any ideas? Could I
>handle -/ls/ specially? The -/l/ itself I find quite nice.
>
> **Henrik
In Vallés, l + s becomes dz (dental + laminal) after a vowel. The epenthetic e
is used when the singular ends in two consonants (or a voiceless consonant).
Jeff
Reply