Re: Diving In...
From: | William Annis <annis@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 14:21 |
>From: Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
>
>And I thought Euskara's verbal system was complicated... How can people store
>such complex things in their minds I'll never understand... The human mind is
>really a wonder...
Yep. It was after a close reading of a West Greenlandic
grammar that I decided all my affixes didn't have to be completely
orthogonal. There is *all sorts* of assimilation going on in
W.G. Inuktitut, which often changes both ends of an affix
dramatically. If the Inuit can do it, so can I! :)
>There is a mark of subject in the participles too? Wow!
>
>> Add to that ergative structure, a bunch of different cases, a huge
>> series of demonstrative pronouns ("this here," "that near by," that over
>> there," "that out of sight," and others) and the whole polysynthetic
>> thing... Eek!
>>
>
>:))) Well, I can understand that where they live, the Inuit don't have much
>landscape features to explain geographical situations. So they have to resort
>to a complex system of demonstrative pronouns. As for the rest...
I understand in Greenland, one of the demonstratives with a
primary meaning of "that out at sea" now is used a lot to refer to
anything in Denmark. :) As always, this "that out of site thingy"
demonstrative made it into Vaior.
--
wm