From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Monday, April 5, 2004, 18:47 |
Okay, I'm currently working on a small side-language (called ['r\Vm,bjUgv]) which is in need of an orthography. The problem is that its phoneme set consists of the entire repertoire of phones in (my 'lect of) English, and despite this phonological similarity I refuse to go the English route and overload the symbols. So far, I'm thinking that <c> for [S] and <j> for [Z] seem reasonable. Dunno what to do about [D], [N] and [T], though. I'm reluctant to introduce <ð>, <ŋ>, and <þ> or <θ> for them, and there's certainly no obious mapping from <q> and <x> to any pair of those sounds. And the vowels! I'm obviously going to have to do quasi-overloading here with diacritical marks; I'm opting for a typical "long"/"short" distinction, probably indicated with a macron, that really indicates quality rather than quantity: /e/ = [E], /e:/ = [e], /i/ = [I], /i:/ = [i], /o/ = [O], /o:/ = [o], /u/ = [U], /u:/ = [u]. But that still doesn't quite solve the problem. Assuming /a:/ represents [a], for instance, what does /a/ represent: [V] or [&]? How do I represent the other one? And what about [@]? The Lojban solution of using <y> for [@] isn't available since <y> is used for [j], and I've never been completely happy with <'>, which is what I used to represent [@] in Okaikiar. Any suggestions welcome. Thanks (['SVmp.wi])! -Mark
Adam Walker <carrajena@...> |