Re: CHAT: An introduction

Philip Newton scripsit:

> Anything wrong with ISO 8859-4 (Latin-4, North European, n-cedilla at
> 0xF1), ISO 8859-10 (Latin-6, Nordic, n-cedilla at 0xF1), or ISO
> 8859-13 (Latin-7, Baltic Rim, n-cedilla at 0xF2)?
Basically all of them are very little used; it turned out that Europeans
wanted to be European, not regional, which is why Turkish uses
8859-9 (Latin-5), a variant of Latin-1 with the Icelandic charactres
replaced by Turkish ones, rather than the Latin-3 they were originally
supposed to use.  AFAIK nobody uses Latin-3 now except for Esperanto
and perhaps Maltese.

Probably the best accepted is Latin-7, and even that is not very well
accepted either.

--
So that's the tune they play on                 John Cowan
their fascist banjos, is it?                    cowan@ccil.org
        --Great-Souled Sam                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan