Re: CHAT: An introduction

Philip Newton scripsit:

> So what I usually see is that s-cedilla is shaped like s-cedilla
> (perhaps because Turkey is a bigger market than Romania) but that
> t-cedilla is shaped like t-comma (because there is no European
> language that uses t-cedilla with a cedilla shape underneath in the
> preferred glyph).
Indeed, t-cedilla is not used, as far as the Unicode folks know, by
any language anywhere.  Now that proper Romanian s-comma and t-comma
characters are encoded in both Unicode and ISO 8859-16, t-cedilla has
become a ghost character.  (Feel free to use it, conlangers!)

--
I am expressing my opinion.  When my            John Cowan
honorable and gallant friend is called,         jcowan@reutershealth.com
he will express his opinion.  This is           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
the process which we call Debate.                   --Winston Churchill

Reply