Re: CHAT: An introduction

>Patientia virtus est.  :)
>
>For whatever reason, this list is slower than most; you have to allow
>some time between sending a message and receiving your copy.  Let's
>see, this one is dated 15:16 UTC and I just now got it at 15:36 UTC,
>so it took twenty minutes to make it through.
>
>Welcome aboard!

Thank you.

Sadly I had only about 85 minutes's worth of patience.  There were about 90
minutes between my two postings of my introduction.  Both the second
posting and the message to ask whether anyone had received the first came
back to me in under 2 minutes.  The first posting I didn't receive till 10
seconds after I sent the second copy of the introduction, though.  All very
strange; but I apologise again for the repetition.  And of course for this
posting, which I suppose is also unnecessary. :)

Anyway, I'll know better in future.

Ian