Matt Trinsic said:
>
> But wouldn't it be interesting to invent a language in which a 2nd
person > inanimate is useful? Maybe a language where it is used when you
are
> writing a letter? Viewing it as yourself talking to the paper, and the
> paper later talking to the intended recipient. I am sure there must be
> other interesting ways of making 2nd person inanimate useful as well. Or
> maybe I am just a sucker for bizarre languages ;)
I often feel like I'm talking to a brick wall.
Brick walls are inanimate, aren't they?
-- Mark