Re: THEORY: Deriving adjectives from nouns

Dans un courrier dat=E9 du 05/06/99 21:59:48  , charles a =E9crit :

> Semantic lexemes can be distinguished from grammatical morphemes:
>  http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/rbeard/homepage.html#lexmorph
indeed (very interesting site). you know that the morphem is specificaly=20
grammatical when it doesn't fit into any other specialised semantic category=20
;-) lojban or tunu relators are "sch=E8me" classes, i.e. a description of th=
e=20
relation between the theme and the rheme ("entit=E9 et comportement"), wheth=
er=20
active, attributive or equative. you may as well decide that "to wear as a=20
white pointed hat" is one of these sch=E8mes. like you may ignore that natla=
ngs=20
usually analyse rainbow as displaying 5 to 12 colours and decide that it=20
displays 2 or 958 colours. you'll always be right.
my point is that different roles are isolated and used in integrated nouns o=
f=20
actors and help tie up the right meaning of paired words. you may use them o=
r=20
let them flat out. but if you're considering "disambiguating" i suggest you=20
use 958 ;-)

mathias