THEORY: Paucal and Trial Grammatical Number

I read "somewhere" that Greenberg said there are no true "trial" numbers; that
these are all really "paucal".
I also read a very interesting Feature Geometry article (on person, number, and
"class" or grammatical gender) that, if true, would imply that no language
could have both a paucal number and a "true" trial number separate and distinct
from each other.

(1) Does anyone know of any NatLang that definitely has both
     *     a trial number distinct from its dual and paucal numbers
     *     a paucal number distinct from its trial and "plural-of-abundance" number
?

Failing that,
(2) Does anyone know of
     *     a NatLang that has a "true trial" number that is demonstrably not a paucal
     *     a NatLang that has a "true paucal" that is demonstrably not a trial
?
(Note: for question 2, as for question 1, I mean that the numbers sought are
definitely different from, on the one hand, the dual, and on the other hand,
the "plural of abundance".

-----
Thanks.


		
---------------------------------
Discover Yahoo!
 Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out!