Re: CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment)
| From: | John Cowan <cowan@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, November 25, 2003, 19:48 |
|---|
Stephen Mulraney scripsit:
> >>ROTFLMAOWUFNMVHGWLDKFQPEO!
>
> I have a suspicion that this doesn't actually stand for anything, past the
> first AO or so :). I mean, I could well be wrong, but not only are there an
> unusually high proportion of the zanier consonants, but there's no _S_.
Too right. Very well, then, I give you
"ROTFLMAOBABABADALGHARAGHTAKAMMINARRONNKONNBRONNTONNERRONNTUONNTHUNNTROVARRHOUNAWNSKAWNTOOHOOHOORDENENTHURNUK!"
--
Values of beeta will give rise to dom! John Cowan
(5th/6th edition 'mv' said this if you tried http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
to rename '.' or '..' entries; see jcowan@reutershealth.com
http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/odd.html)
Reply