Re: new lang: dgsrdmaphkaskrht
|From:||Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>|
|Date:||Saturday, December 28, 2002, 20:49|
En réponse à Robert B Wilson <han_solo55@...>:
> i'll have to work on that. trying to organise it into rules is one of
> those things that kind of gets more complicated as you go along (each
> rule i write requires a bunch of sub-rules, which also require
> sub-rules... this could take a while)
Do not even try to explain *all* cases with your rules. If you really have a
lot of irregularities, one level of rules with at most one level of subrules is
enough (if you don't need too many subrules). In most cases, just one main rule
and treat the rest as irregular is enough. I did that in Maggel, although often
some irregularities can be explained with subrules themselves divided in
subsubrules, etc... Sometimes it's just useless to try to categorise all the
patterns you find.
Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.