Re: Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
From: | Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 10, 2006, 18:22 |
-----Original Message-----
>From: Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
You've hit it precicely. It is *a* de-facto Wiki of the list. There are at least two
others, plus this newest one.
>If you're not yet too emotionally wedded to your own Wiki, I suggest
>you have a look at that -- one thing worse than having no Wiki for
>conlangs is having several dozen Wikis, each with very little content.
I'd suggest that someone or ones with a stern hand but a fair eye go over the
extant conlang Wikis, and combine them into a single, slightly more de-jure,
source. I suspect it would be a legthy as well as difficult task, though. I
suggest instead that we hold some kind of referendum to determine our preferred
Wiki (or indeed whether a unified Wiki is desirable), and each take
responsibility to move our own content to a unified new home, if needed.
Alternatively, the process could probably be automated with wget, expect, and perl, though
that might be a nightmare to actually implement.
Paul
Reply