From: | Javier BF <uaxuctum@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 20:54 |
>> Of >> course, "in his bed" is inessive, but it's also a place, and that's whyit>> can be locative as well, right? > >I'm unfamiliar with this particular piece of terminology, but as far as I >understand it, Javier's using "locative" for mandatory and "inessive" for >optional specifications of place.No, actually, since in the same paragraph I was mentioning "locative object" ("the garden" of the famous example), I chose the word "inessive" so as to avoid repeating the word "locative" or having to say something like "locative locative" to emphasize that then I was referring to places seen as locations of an event rather than as affected participants of it. "Inessive" in fact is only a kind of "locative" - the kind expressed in English by "in" (which could be rephrased as "at the inside of", using the general locative "at"). I'm not aware of any term that refers to mandatory locative arguments as opposed to merely optional locatives. Cheers, Javier
Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> |