"Tristan McLeay" <conlang@...> wrote:
>
> Personally, I don't think it's fair to say that a particular glyph form
> is wrong, unless all the people who use the character dislike the form.
> Capital Eng is not defined by any script which mandates particular
> glyph styles, unlike lowercase eng. Even if it were, no-one thinks it's
> wrong that there's two possible glyphs for g, but the IPA says only one
> form is correct. The enlarged eng form is commonly used, is not
> confuseable for some other symbol
The "incomplete D" is confused with U+E014 TENGWAR LETTER OORE
http://www.evertype.com/standards/csur/tengwar.html
Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> wrote:
> Some of your complaints about it though remind me of why i don't like
> the uppercase thorn letter :-P .
At least uppercase thorn is good for sticking out your e-tongue
symmetrically :-Þ .
--
Damian