Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Eng (was: Name mangling)

From:Damian Yerrick <tepples@...>
Date:Monday, March 14, 2005, 22:46
"Tristan McLeay" <conlang@...> wrote:
> > Personally, I don't think it's fair to say that a particular glyph form > is wrong, unless all the people who use the character dislike the form. > Capital Eng is not defined by any script which mandates particular > glyph styles, unlike lowercase eng. Even if it were, no-one thinks it's > wrong that there's two possible glyphs for g, but the IPA says only one > form is correct. The enlarged eng form is commonly used, is not > confuseable for some other symbol
The "incomplete D" is confused with U+E014 TENGWAR LETTER OORE http://www.evertype.com/standards/csur/tengwar.html Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> wrote:
> Some of your complaints about it though remind me of why i don't like > the uppercase thorn letter :-P .
At least uppercase thorn is good for sticking out your e-tongue symmetrically :-Þ . -- Damian

Reply

Tristan McLeay <conlang@...>