Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Eng (was: Name mangling)

From:Jean-François Colson <fa597525@...>
Date:Thursday, March 10, 2005, 9:25
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip Newton" <philip.newton@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: Eng (was: Name mangling)


> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:52:52 +0000, Ray Brown <ray.brown@...> > wrote: >> Eng certainly has an upper case form. It's like the ordinary upper case N >> with the 'eng tail'. Eng is actually used in some natlang orthographies. >> >> But you're sure right that it's riskier in electronic form than Ñ and ñ. >> Upper case eng is supposed to be Unicode Hex U+014A, namely Ŋ >> >> But my mailer displays it as a sort of lower case _h_, which is quite >> wrong, and so do most of the many, many fonts on my machine; only Cardo >> and Zapfino display it correctly. >> >> So if you want to see what the symbol really looks like, read my mail in >> Cardo or Zapfino :) > > I saw it like this: > http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v405/pne/uppercase-eng.png . I don't > know which font my mailer chose; the body of the mail was Arial, > however. > > It doesn't look like the Unicode reference glyph (capital N with eng > tail), but not like a lower-case h, either -- more like an incomplete > capital D or, well, a capital version of lower-case eng (but with no > descender). >
Apparently, there are two competing forms for the uppercase eng. Just have a look at the Unicode standard. http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0100.pdf, bottom of page 5 014A Ŋ LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ENG * glyph may also have appearance of large form of the small letter.