Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: brief survey

From:Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...>
Date:Friday, September 9, 2005, 16:09
Hallo!

Trent Pehrson wrote:

> Most excellent list members, > > I make a humble request for the sole purpose of satiating my own > curiosity. Please respond to the following, brief survey: > > 1) Do you consider yourself a linguist?
To a degree, yes, but only an amateur linguist. But then, linguistics is just one of my hobbies.
> 2) Given only the following labels, which best describes linguistics > as a discipline for you? (a) a scientific discipline (b) a philosophical > discipline.
(a), though one that touches on philosophical issues sometimes.
> 3) Given only the following definitions, which comes closest to > describing the purpose of linguistics for you? (a) learning to speak many > languages. (b) learning the structures of languages. (c) learning how > language works in the human mind. (d) defining and cataloging languages. > (e) defining language at large. (e) the humanistic study of language and > literature.
(c), also (b) and (d).
> 4) Do you consider yourself a scientist?
To some degree, but not professionally.
> 5) Given only the following definitions, which comes closest to > describing the purpose of science for you? (a) the search for truth. (b) > use of the scientific method to create theories by proving or disproving > hypotheses (c) the process of discovering natural laws.
(b), mostly, but also (a) and (c).
> 6) Do you consider yourself a philosopher?
Not really.
> 7) Given only the following definitions, which comes closest to > describing the purpose of philosophy for you? (a) the search for truth. > (b) the pursuit of wisdom by intellectual means and moral self-discipline. > (c) the study of the nature of reality based on logical reasoning rather > than empirical methods. (d) a critical analysis of fundamental assumptions > or beliefs. (e) a discipline comprising logic, ethics, aesthetics, > metaphysics, and epistemology.
(d). But much philosophical writing I have seen amounts to (f) the art of saying as little as possible with as much advanced and obfuscated terminology as possible while trying to be intellectually fashionable. Greetings, Jörg.