Trent Pehrson wrote:
>Most excellent list members,
>
>I make a humble request for the sole purpose of satiating my own
>curiosity. Please respond to the following, brief survey:
>
>1) Do you consider yourself a linguist?
>
>
No, but conlanging is an avocation of mine.
>2) Given only the following labels, which best describes linguistics
>as a discipline for you? (a) a scientific discipline (b) a philosophical
>discipline.
>
>
This is not a meaningful distinction, since "science" is simply that
branch of philosophy which deals with the physical world, that is
"natural philosophy".
>3) Given only the following definitions, which comes closest to
>describing the purpose of linguistics for you? (a) learning to speak many
>languages. (b) learning the structures of languages. (c) learning how
>language works in the human mind. (d) defining and cataloging languages.
>(e) defining language at large. (e) the humanistic study of language and
>literature.
>
>
(c)
>4) Do you consider yourself a scientist?
>
>
See answer 2
>5) Given only the following definitions, which comes closest to
>describing the purpose of science for you? (a) the search for truth. (b)
>use of the scientific method to create theories by proving or disproving
>hypotheses (c) the process of discovering natural laws.
>
Well (b) is the means, not the end, of science, (c) is too specific, so
(a) has to be the answer.
>
>6) Do you consider yourself a philosopher?
>
>
One who loves knowledge? Yes.
>7) Given only the following definitions, which comes closest to
>describing the purpose of philosophy for you? (a) the search for truth.
>(b) the pursuit of wisdom by intellectual means and moral self-discipline.
>(c) the study of the nature of reality based on logical reasoning rather
>than empirical methods. (d) a critical analysis of fundamental assumptions
>or beliefs. (e) a discipline comprising logic, ethics, aesthetics,
>metaphysics, and epistemology.
>
>
(e)
þ
>
>