b!t revolut!on : : part _ 0+2
|Date:||Wednesday, January 20, 1999, 14:08|
- part 0+0 dze b!t revolut!on. 0+0 elokuent oppoz!t!on 2 dze
max forum lo.tekk `democracy`
any student has to learn -
to expose plainly itself
to the plain word of the other without translation.
this evokes in the image of a striving for intimacy with the other.
a striving to gain intimacy via finding a common language to describe a
shared experience. no - finding a common language in order to +create+ a
this is >exactly< the contrary of what is meant en fact:
there is +no+ shared experience.
the one-ly shared experience is the situation of a place [i.e. a time]
there is a finding of a common language
through a sharing of experience and vice versa +?
certainly +not+. there no vice-versa. the vice-versa is
diachronic: the common langauge is a mirage.
with an incomprehensible written text the uncomprehending reader is stuck
blocked from insight.
this is exactly it. and exactly the way humans >do< operate:
+NOT+ to understand.
i am responsible of >my< words: but stand-under the `significant`.
the method by which to become unstuck is to discuss the text with
one life form which does not feel abs stuck by it so that there can be a
experience of finding a common language among reader1-text-reader2.
this is theoretical work in a fine art way: literature i.e. or a linguistic
approach in a laboratory shared in a team of researchers.
the transference of unconscious desire
between two persons expressed by the speech of one of the two.
- a quote from sigmund koch:
language is at best a feeble instrument
even among members of a highly
trained language community having quite limited problematic interests.
physicists in one empirical area do not necessarily fully understand
physicists in another.
within each scientific area even when granulated
rather finely there may be distinguished disorderly hierarchies of language
in the extreme case there may be definite and unique
observable properties and relations which only two men perhaps working in
the same laboratory may be able to perceive and denote by some linguistic
moreover it should be stressed that the stratification of
language communities within a science may reflect variations in the
sensitivity of observers just as much as differential foci of training
- end a quote from sigmund koch:
this side of language is the +PERFORMING+ side.
it is >vital< for social efficiency
physic . economic . politik means for the >survival< of every life form.
the practice of science uses it extensively.
it is highly respectable so.
the unconscious discourse of desire the lack of the 'significant'
or the myth of the agalma object pin [the -at least- 3 structures]
are matters of the language +OUT+ of the performing space.
it is the +TRANSFERANTIAL+ side of human language.
the point is: if one decides [an ethical decision] to apply the
understanding way to transference one fails always .
because the paradoxical nature of the unconscious is to be +NOT+ understood.
here and now.
it is why the technique of zen or the one of humor or surprise or silence
- the unconscious is not intelligent - but its
only goal is: not to be understood.
2 add: it is as a part of the human being >legitimate<.
in this way the concept of gaining entry into a text is parallel to that
of subscribing to a fantasy.
!f unfortunatel! du = dz!dd 2 abort dze m9ndfukc rout!n:
teczt: subscribe unsubscribe m9ndfukc
- part 0+0 dze b!t revolut!on. 0+1 elokuent oppoz!t!on 2 dze
max forum lo.tekk `democracy`
\ \ continued in part 0+2 - may konsult subsequent transmissions if so
THE VOTE [excerpt]
Please note: There is NO campaign period, the vote question is NOT to be
debated on the list. Anyone posting propaganda one way or another
regarding this vote will be removed from the list immediately.
MAX listserv owner
please formulate own
diagnosis upon completion of one meticulous analysis
a = k
t humanz == !