Re: Spell Checking for Non European Languages, and for Conlangs
From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 12:43 |
Hi!
Chris Bates <christopher.bates@...> writes:
> Lisp is supposedly good for that sort of thing too, but it
> suffers from serious bracket addiction a la C. Not elegant at all.
Suffers? Not elegant?? What do you mean? It is very, very, very,
very nice and concise! :-)
Lisp has another great advantage over other languages: there is no
difference between data and code. Therefore, you usually do not write
any parsers for your data files, but simply write the data as Lisp.
I love that language! :-)
Ok, a layout rule would be nice...
**Henrik
PS: It is not an ultimate love, though. For conlanging, a good
mixture of Lisp, Perl and C++ serves me best. I should not
program in C++, though; it is so primitive and yet so
unnecessarily complex. I'm definitely not in love with it. I
will switch to Haskell or Clean in the future, I promise.
Reply