Re: My Grammatical Sketch (again!)
From: | Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <ira@...> |
Date: | Saturday, October 16, 1999, 6:57 |
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Daniel Andreasson wrote:
> Myself, I'm thinking about making Rinya both head and
> dependent marking (and head initial). Something like:
>
> Reigar rewecyn iyn
> Vegetable:PL-ABS green:PL-ABS the:PL-ABS
>
> cwet-a-ri-sh dich-en in-en
> buy-PRES-3sg:SUB-3sg:OBJ father-ERG the-ERG
Don't you need "buy-PRES-3sg:SUB-3pl:OBJ", as the green vegetables
are marked plural?
> That is, I mark the arguments both on the verb (with an accusative system)
> and on the NPs themselves (with an ergative/'active' system). Somewhat
> unusual I guess, but why not? I like it. Redundancy rules!
> What do you think?
Yes, I like it too; makes me wish Valdyan wasn't so far developed
already. It's not like me to start a new language just to try out
interesting features (I don't keep 48-hour days and I'd rather use my
time and energy for what I'm already working on), or to change
retroactively what is already there.
Irina
Varsinen an laynynay, saraz no arlet rastynay.
irina@rempt.xs4all.nl (myself)
http://www.xs4all.nl/~bsarempt/irina/index.html (English)
http://www.xs4all.nl/~bsarempt/irina/backpage.html (Nederlands)