Re: Lurkers
From: | Thomas R. Wier <artabanos@...> |
Date: | Friday, April 21, 2000, 13:49 |
yl-ruil wrote:
> To all our Lurkers:I'm not trying to be offensive; I honestly don't understand.
> Why lurk? Don't you feel like you want
> to join in with all the arguments (whoops! civilised debates). That's the best
> bit for me- my first day on the list I
> sparked off an argument (the s-->h debate, which I thought should go s->z->h) and
> the most recent such was my argument
> with Vasily about fracturing in OE (that was fun! thanks Basileus!). What do you
> actually do, just read all the
> postings?
I don't know if I should even consider myself a lurker, because
of how much I have participated in the past. Now I am almost
always caught up in school affairs and must avoid the temptation
to pay too much attention to the lists I'm on (Deutsche Welle,
Indo-European, and this). Otherwise, I'd be on all the time --
there's almost always something interesting to talk about on
Conlang.
======================================
Tom Wier <artabanos@...>
ICQ#: 4315704 AIM: trwier
"Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero."
======================================