Re: Lurkers

> yl-ruil wrote:
>
> To all our Lurkers:
> I'm not trying to be offensive; I honestly don't understand. Why lurk?
> Don't you feel like you want to join in with all the arguments
> (whoops! civilised debates). <snip>
Not at all. I used to participate much more. My problem right now is
simply time. I'm studying two natlangs, trying to devote time to my
needlework and painting, and producing graphic fiction (i.e. comic
book-style stories) in installments. Oh yeah, I'm also employed full
time. As much as I love conlanging, it's been put on hold for a while.

You can see a bit of what I *have* been doing at the URL below.

> What do you actually do, just read all the postings?
>
Hee, hee. Hardly get to scan them anymore. But I couldn't bring myself
to sign off the list completely either.

Laurie
milo@winternet.com
http://www.winternet.com/~milo
--
"Being bright does not grant an immunity to doing idiotic
things; more like, it just enlarges the possible scope."
     -- Lois McMaster Bujold