Tommie L Powell:
> And Rosta wrote:
>
> > Politically, of course. But not linguistically. I think it is
> > instructive to realize that a language that has the
> > expressive capabilities of a natlang but that is
> > unambiguous is linguistically achievable.
>
> Actually, there are some natlangs that are very nearly
> impossible to make ambiguous statements in (without
> violating mandatory rules of grammar). Czech is one
I react with polite skepticism. I wonder whether you are thinking
only of syntactic ambiguity? (I have often heard it said that
languages with well-marked case systems are less prone to
ambiguity.)
--And.