And Rosta wrote:
> Politically, of course. But not linguistically. I think it is
> instructive to realize that a language that has the
> expressive capabilities of a natlang but that is
> unambiguous is linguistically achievable.
Actually, there are some natlangs that are very nearly
impossible to make ambiguous statements in (without
violating mandatory rules of grammar). Czech is one
-- so the Czechs have become adept at sneaking
ambiguity into sentences by slurring key words (so that
listeners can imagine that something else is being said)!