Re: CHAT: Is anybody here? Hello?

Dan Sulani wrote:

Oops! I just reread my previous posting (after sending it out, naturally) and
realsized that I'm getting sloppy with my  rtemmu grammar.  Instead of:

>                 liwuhwuh seksebtse auag dava'io`gfr`shuh.
>
it should go:
                    liwuhwuh seksebtse auag wuh dava'io`gfr`shuh.

(The third "wuh"  refers to the fact that the rate of change of the emotion is
unknown)

In rtemmu, the particles that describe speed of change may be dropped if they are
understood, which is what I did, considering that, if everybody didn't know either
everyone's speed of development and all individual understandings of truth,
then obviously, everyone's appreciation of the emotion of "only-ness" would also be
unknown. Thus I dropped it.
However, it is not good form in rtemmu to have a content-word without at least one
rate-of -change particle preceding it.
Usually, the rate of the speaker's change is dropped, but the rate of the process is
usually kept, even if it is obvious.

Dan Sulani

--
 likehsna  rtem  zuv  tikuhnuh  auag  inuvuz  vaka'a.

 A  word  is  an  awesome  thing.