John Cowan wrote:
>Dennis Paul Himes scripsit:
>
> > There was just a thread about this on sci.math, only with radians
>and
> > 0.739085133215.
>
>IIRC this is much slower.
It is. Starting on 1 dot something required a couple dozen reiterations
'fore it reached the attractor (to the precision of my calculator).
Oh, and someday I'd like to see the list of all subjects that've never been
discussed on Conlang. I imagine it to be frighteningly short.
Andreas
> The attractor of sin is 0, but it takes the
>patience of Job to get all the way there.
_________________________________________________________________
Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN!
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp