Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German]
From: | Herman Miller <hmiller@...> |
Date: | Saturday, September 29, 2001, 2:52 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:29:23 -0400, John Cowan <cowan@...>
wrote:
>Thomas R. Wier scripsit:
>
>> > No, I'm not Southern Californian, but I know an acquaintance who has
>> > the very annoying speech impediment of pronouncing the word "milk"
>> > as /mELk/ (with velar l) and "because" as /b@kUz/. I cringe every
>> > time he says either of them :)
>>
>> Well, where's he from? That pronunciation of "because" is
>> actually widespread in Britain.
>
>It's what I've always said, and I render "milk" as something like /mlk/,
>and almost nobody can understand it. My wife says it just disappears
>into the ether.
Hmmm.... this is odd... neither [mI5k] or [mE5k] seems right to me, but
what else could it be? Maybe the /I/ is centralized to be something like
[mI_"5k] or [m@\5k]? Hmm... it's even possible that the /l/ is realized as
something like a velar approximant. But I'm pretty sure it's still some
kind of /l/. I'm not sure what the vowel is, but if anything it seems less
like /I/ than /E/ or even /@/. "Milk" doesn't seem to rhyme with words like
"ilk" or "filk", but those are words learned from reading. But I've heard
TV ads that definitely sounded like [mI5k], and that's not the way I say
it. So I guess you could add me to the list of /mElk/-speakers. I wonder
where I could've picked up something like that?
BTW, I say /bI'kVz/ (something like [bI"k_h6z]).
--
languages of Azir------> ---<http://www.io.com/~hmiller/lang/index.html>---
hmiller (Herman Miller) "If all Printers were determin'd not to print any
@io.com email password: thing till they were sure it would offend no body,
\ "Subject: teamouse" / there would be very little printed." -Ben Franklin