Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Proto-Uralic?

From:Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...>
Date:Friday, June 27, 2003, 11:52
Rob Haden <magwich78@...> writes:

> Unfortunately, there are relatively few resources for Proto-Uralic on the > Web, and what is on there is relatively inconsistent. I am actually in the > process of compiling information for my own reconstruction of Proto- > Uralic. However, I can list some commonly accepted features of PU: > > [list of PU features snup]
Thank you! Most of this I have already found elsewhere, but this summary is very useful.
> This is only a brief summary of Proto-Uralic, and I hope to have a more > descriptive grammar soon. Do you have your own ideas regarding PU? I > would be interested in hearing them.
I have no particular ideas of my own about PU; I know too little to build my own opinion. I have seen the "reconstruction" done by G. Decsy, but that is not worth the paper it is printed on. He rejects the comparative method, instead "reconstructing" for each cognate set a minimal-change ancestral form *in isolation*, a "method" which obviously gives false readings, yielding a result where no result is to expect, namely in case of similar-looking non-cognates. The resulting forms are often homonyms that "evolved" into non-homonyms in the attested Uralic languages! Decsy also confuses the historical linguistics term "proto-language" with the homonymous term in language origins studies, claims that Proto-Uralic had no more than the 400-something words he "reconstructed", and that the speakers of Proto-Uralic did not use names (an anthropological impossibility; and that even though he "reconstructs" a PU word for "name"). I have also seen pages where it is claimed that Proto-Uralic never existed, but rather that Uralic was a convergence area. Apparently, the field is less developed than IE historical linguistics, which might be due to (1) the lack of attested ancient languages (imagine how difficult it would be to reconstruct PIE from the modern IE languages alone), and (2) the much smaller number of scholars working on Uralic. Another problem one meets in exploring Uralic historical linguistics is that many of the materials available are written in Uralic languages ;-/ Jörg. ______________________________________________________________________________ UNICEF bittet um Spenden fur die Kinder im Irak! Hier online an UNICEF spenden: https://spenden.web.de/unicef/special/?mc=021101

Reply

Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>Origin of names (WAS: Re: Proto-Uralic?)