Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: A proposal to bring together the conlang communities

From:Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...>
Date:Saturday, January 26, 2008, 17:41
On Jan 26, 2008 12:00 AM, Sai Emrys <sai@...> wrote:
> Right now, the conlang community as a whole is split up into many separate fora. > > To list only some of them (and in no particular order), there are: > Lists etc: CONLANG-L, AUXLANG-L, LOJBAN-L, yahoo elfling,
and Usenet's alt.language.artificial.
> Media: Tower of Babel, conlanger.com journal, model languages > newsletter (all defunct)
Also the Journal of Planned Languages (Rick Harrison) and the Journal of Unnecessary Languages (Steve Brewer), also defunct.
> Now, I can fully understand that in some cases this has been necessary > from the perspective of keeping discussion topical and to keep people > from butting heads too much (auxlang evangelism comes to mind as one > very easy flamewar-starter). I can also completely understand the > different utility, and mood, created by different fora types. > > However, it seems to me that this degree of splitting is both > technically and socially suboptimal.
Most of the fora you mentioned are specialized enough that their continued existence makes perfect sense. But the only reason I can see for having four different general-purpose conlang fora (CONLANG-L, ZBB, CBB, and LJ-conlangs) is that different people are comfortable with different interfaces. Some people prefer mailing lists, some prefer web BBSs, and of the latter some prefer the phpBB interface and some the LJ interface (or they already have a LJ account for other purposes and want to use that instead of signing up for a new account at ZBB, conlanger.com, or listserv.brown.edu). Maybe it would be nice to turn CONLANG-L into a mailing list interface for ZBB, for instance, or ZBB into a phpBB interface for CONLANG-L... but doesn't ZBB throw away most messages after a certain amount of time? CONLANG preserves messages in the archives (both at brown.edu and conlang.info) indefinitely. On the other hand, merging them all (if you could navigate the political problems and the technical problems of doing so) would probably create a forum that's so high-traffic nobody could keep up with it. -- Jim Henry http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry

Reply

<li_sasxsek@...>