Re: That pesky H again (was: varia)

At 15:21 -0600 7.2.2000, Ed Heil wrote:
>
>I understand, and in fact in my original version of the post, which i
>lost through an accident, I had said as much -- that voice was just
>about the only particularly salient feature of [@], since the other
>features are basically "leave the articulators in rest position", so
>it isn't too much of a stretch to say "[@] and voice are the same
>thing."  If you had to pick a phone to represent voicing, the way [i]
>or [j] represent palatalization, [@] would be the one.
In fact what I do in my still-in-draft scheme for phonetic notation in
ASCII (which is not an IPA retranscription, but aims at consistency within
itself.)



/BP

 B.Philip Jonsson  <mailto: bpj@...> <mailto: melroch@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__
            Anant' avanaute quettalmar!               \ \
   __  ____ ____    _____________  ___ __   __ __     / /
   \ \/___ \\__ \  /___  _____/\ \\__ \\ \  \ \\ \   / /
   / /   / /  /  \    / /Melroch\ \_/ // /  / // /  / /
  / /___/ /_ / /\ \  / /Melarocco\_  // /__/ // /__/ /
 /_________//_/  \_\/ /Eowine__   / / \___/\_\\___/\_\
I neer Pityancalimeo\ \_____/ /ar/ /_atar Mercasso naan
~~~~~~~~~Cuinondil~~~\_______/~~~\__/~~~Noolendur~~~~~~
|| Lenda lenda pellalenda pellatellenda cuivie aiya! ||
"A coincidence, as we say in Middle-Earth" (JRR Tolkien)