Re: USAGE: syllables
From: | Nik Taylor <yonjuuni@...> |
Date: | Monday, February 2, 2004, 4:40 |
Alexandre Lang wrote:
> Maybe breaks between words, for example?
Those are often marked by simple spaces. And there is the use of # to
mark word-boundaries where necessary.
> So it's just to facilitate manipulation of some languages?
> It's not a general rule then and doesn't apply to all languages?
No, no, it is a general rule. Rhyme = nucleus + coda. That was just
part of the reason for having the concept of rhyme.
> And it's true that it would be possible to have a language that would
> nasalize a vowel when they preceded by a nasal consonant, in which case
> the onset and nucleus would form the rhyme?
Well, except that a language that nasalized a vowel when following a
nasal consonant would also do it when preceding a nasal consonant, so
you'd simply describe the rule as "nasalize vowels when a nasal
consonant exists in the same syllable". As I understand it, the
combination onset + nucleus simply doesn't pattern distinctly from the
whole unit "syllable", so that there's no need to create a special term.
--
"There's no such thing as 'cool'. Everyone's just a big dork or nerd,
you just have to find people who are dorky the same way you are." -
overheard
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42
Reply