Re: A BrSc a?
From: | Jeffrey Henning <jeffrey@...> |
Date: | Thursday, April 25, 2002, 20:20 |
> But the main drawbacks, as I see it, with such a scheme are:
> 1. I must include phonemes which are not "IAL-friendly"
> 2. There is no 'self-segregation' of morphemes in such a scheme.
>
> i.e. pushing brevity to its limits runs contrary to the other two goals of
> BrSc.
>
> That's the challenge of BrSc - to balance the three goals. :)
Have you thought about having a goal of making sure the words are easy to
type?
Herman Miller and I have been bouncing ideas off each other about what makes
a specific word easier to type than another -- important for a brief script
in today's world. Obviously, words that start on the home keys are easier,
words that repeat a letter are easier, but beyond that while we have come up
with some algorithms we don't have anything definitive. It should be
possible to write a script to give a word a score based on its letters.
BTW, when are you coming to the States next?
Fond regards,
Jeffrey
Reply