Re: Judean Romancelang Plans
From: | Eric Christopherson <eric@...> |
Date: | Friday, January 22, 1999, 4:58 |
Don Blaheta wrote:
> There are five vowels, each of which can be short or long. The length
> is actually a time thing in Republic times, but already by early Empire
> it was starting to become a distinction of quality as well; by about the
> fourth century CE certain mergers had occurred to reduce the system to
> seven vowels (/aeEioOu/, iirc).
Here's a chart of vowel changes in Vulgar Latin (IIRC):
short or long a > /a/
short e or ae > /E/ (later diphthongized to /'i.e/>/je/)
long e or oe or short i > /e/
long i > /i/
short o > /O/ (later diphthongized to /'u.o/>/wo/, in Spanish to
/we/)
long o or short u > /o/
long u > /u/
Y seemed to work the same as I, but I don't know if there was a
difference between short and long Y as there was between short and
long I.
AE and OE also caused a preceding C or G to palatalize.
> I'm really not sure
> where Z entered in, although I'm pretty sure it wasn't originally in
> Latin.
No, it was borrowed from Greek for the sound of zeta in Greek words.
Latin originally had no /z/, like PIE. I believe Z was /dz/.
> > Also, in order to test out this system, i'd like to know how to say
> > "Judean" in Latin, so that i can mutate it into the name of the conlang
> > itself.
>
> Well, "of the Jews" was "Iudaeorum", so "Iudaeus/Iudaea" (Jew, Judean)
> would be what you're looking for.