Re: Input on press resources page

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Donald Boozer <donaldboozer@...> wrote:
> - The Klingon link doesn't seem to work. Maybe it needs the www. in the
> anchor? http://www.kli.org?
Fixed.

> - I was wondering if you wanted to link to the UEA (World Esperanto
> Association) instead of wikipedia. Nothing wrong with Wikipedia, but I notice
> you link to sites dedicated to specific languages with the other URLs. Maybe
> http://www.uea.org/info/angla.html? Or
> http://esperanto.net/info/index_en.html? Just a suggestion.
I was considering what to put there... and honestly, I don't really
know what the state of the Esperanto world is (and didn't want to
implicitly "take sides" or such). I couldn't figure out what was
neutral/canonical, so just gave the Wikipedia article (which is quite
good).

What's UEA vs. esperanto.net vs. all the other esperantist websites / orgs?

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Carsten Becker <carbeck@...> wrote:
> The link to the ZBB review of LCC1 and 2 don't work anymore either because
> the threads have been pruned by now. (As far as I know it's 90 days
> retention time except for Ephemera, which has 30 days, and L&L Museum, which
> isn't pruned.) For the coming LCC you might want to save a copy of the
> review thread once people have stopped discussing and mirror it somewhere
> else.
Feh, you're right. That's a pity. It's not on archive.org either. I
guess I'll just delete those.

Well try to remember to mirror in the future.

Thanks,

- Sai

Reply