> Where does the design of imaginary computer architectures (and programming
> languages) stand in the ranks of con-somethinging?
>
> It's probably a highly esoteric question, but that's what I'm doing right
> now, instead of conlanging: noodling around with a few programming language
> designs that each started off as attempts to create notation systems for
> specific problems, and dummying up a few completely impractical computers to
> do thought experiments on. At the hazy borderlines of the two live my
> thoughs of assembler opcodes and register sets (etc) for best implementing a
> given language on one of those computers.
>
> Anyone else ever dug into that sort of stuff?
>
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
>
--
John Osborne
osborne6@ieee.org/osborne6@gmail.com/jro@freeshell.org