Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
From: | Garth W. Wallace <gwalla@...> |
Date: | Saturday, February 14, 2009, 5:41 |
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:51:16 -0500, <deinx nxtxr> <deinx.nxtxr@...>
wrote:
>Back when I first got into computing (~30 years ago) I did toy with ideas
>for my own programming languages. At some point I found the reserved word
>table for Apple BASIC and relexed it to be a closer match for other BASIC's
>of the day. I still have my idea for my own high-level language based mainly
>on C or C++, which moving through the alphabet, and coincidentally landing
>on my first initial would be called "D".
I once came up with my own C++-like partly object oriented procedural
language. I named it T, because it was derived from C and wasn't Java. ;)
I'm still rather proud of it, actually. It had some nifty features, like
explicit polymorphism, true multidimensional arrays, overloading functions
by type context, classification after-the-fact, daisy-chaining loops, and
language support for multithreading (actually, "T" was originally short for
"threaded", but I liked the pun).
Reply