Re: Pronouns & sexualit
From: | Tristan McLeay <conlang@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 19:39 |
On 25/02/09 19:56:02, Paul Kershaw wrote:
> own lapses. To provide a safe example so we can avoid NCNC flare-ups,
...
> If so, such a writing system seems either blindingly simple or
> woefully impossible, depending on how complicated the frame needed to
> be. For instance, we could use Gothic script to render conservative
> opinions and Comic Sans to render liberal ones, and so on, but doing
> so would require a small number of frames, which would in turn lead
> to
> schisms within each frame, no?
Can I say I'm mortally offended by the suggestion, even tongue-in-
cheek, that anyone should or could justifiably use Comic Sans. I would
sooner divest myself of the opinions I have you'd classify as "liberal"
then render them in Comic Sans.
--
Tristan.
(needs to set up threading again so he can ignore the conlang threads
that are likely to make him say something like that)
Replies