Re: Pronouns & sexualit
From: | Tristan McLeay <conlang@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 20:23 |
On 25/02/09 21:00:35, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Tristan McLeay
> <conlang@...> wrote:
> > Can I say I'm mortally offended by the suggestion, even tongue-in-
> > cheek, that anyone should or could justifiably use Comic Sans. I
> would
> > sooner divest myself of the opinions I have you'd classify as
> "liberal"
> > then render them in Comic Sans.
>
> Ooh, a typography snob! For your next lecture, could you elaborate
> on the inherent superiority of Helvetica over Arial? ;-)
Frankly, unlike (lowercase) Comic Sans, neither make me want to gouge
my eyes out. Neither should be seen anywhere near Times (New Roman or
otherwise) or Courier as they mix about as good as oil and water. (If
you must know, I like humanist serifed fonts and sans fonts designed to
match. Monospaced fonts as long as they're harmoniously chosen I'm not
too fussed about.)
--
Tristan.