Re: New to the list

> >What I'm saying is: I have no interest in the politics on AUXLANG. I'm a
> >conlanger with particular interest in the design of IALs, with no concern
> >for their actual use at all. I don't propagate. Therefore, I'm coming to
> >this list. I want to kindly ask permission to post some of my design
>ideas
> >here, even though they are about IALs. Their real nature is much
> >rather "conlangish" or even "artlangish". Would that be okay?
> >
>
>As long as it is about grammar, semantics, phonetics, morphology, etc...
>you can discuss about any language (even natlangs) without restriction, as
>long as you don't want to impose the ideology of an IAL. Some here even
>have IAL projects, but when they discuss them here it's only the linguistic
>features that are discussed, not whether they are better than others for
>international communication.
[kut]

>So you're more than welcome to discuss your IALs here, as long as it is
>about linguistic and artistic features, not about ideology :) .
>
>Welcome!
Thank you very much. My interests in auxlangs or conlangs don't go much
beyound phonetics, phonology, morphology, semantics, etc, so you won't have
to fear anything like that coming from me. If you'd take a look at what I've
written on auxlang in the archives (please don't - auxlang archives aren't
nice to go through ;)), you'd see very little politics, propagation, or
fanaticism. I see auxlangs just as conlangs, where the setting I give for
myself is a hypothetical Earth 2000-something where an IAL has been adopted;
what should that IAL be like?

Oskar
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com