Sally Caves wrote:
> How kludgy do you want it to be? I mean, I can go back as far as my
> pubescent days, with absolutely NO knowledge of linguistics. Is the kludgy
> conlang by someone who's had a taste of other conlangs? Or is he a conlang
> VIRGIN? Here are a few mistakes I made at eleven, peppered with naivetes
> I've seen in some of the nineteenth-century conlangs I've been studying:
<snip>
> Is this kludgy enough? ;)
I think we can call this "Sally's Seven Stages of the Starting
Conlanger". :-)
K.